Integrity and wrongdoing

Professional commitments can easily, yet gradually and unthinkingly, become compromised by personal needs such as earning a living, acquiring wealth, gaining power and authority, and maintaining prestige. Explanations of wrongdoing assist in understanding the nature of wrongdoing. Social explanations use structural features and outside pressures, which maybe systemic as in MCOs or episodic due to the nature of the job, whereas character explanations relate to personal faults, which are not all bad or all good, and can change overtime. The latter can be sorted into:

  • Bad preference which are morally harmful intentions and undesirable desires, either choosing to do the wrong thing or perversely believing it is right.
  • Lack of rational self-control Due to weakness of will (moral weakness) where temptation overrides doing what is right or moral negligence (thoughtlessness, carelessness or lack of due care)
  • Moral indifference due to lack of concern for other (or self) which could be amorality (refusal to apply moral principles) or moral detachment (having moral principles, but failing to apply them)
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s